More Than Just Silicon: The Rise of Biological Computing
Imagine a computer that doesn't run on silicon chips but on living cells. A processor that isn't manufactured in a clean room but grows naturally in a forest. This isn't science fiction—it's the emerging reality of biocomputation, a revolutionary field where biology and computer science converge. While computers have transformed biology through data analysis (bioinformatics), biocomputation flips this relationship: it harnesses biological systems themselves to perform computations.
Traditional computers are reaching physical limits, but biological systems offer astonishing alternatives. Imagine slime molds solving complex travel route problems or fungal networks processing information. This isn't about replacing your laptop with a mushroom, but about understanding computation as a fundamental natural process and leveraging biological principles to solve problems intractable for conventional computers. As researchers explore this frontier, they're finding that life itself computes, processing information in ways we are just beginning to understand.
Biological computation proposes that living organisms naturally perform computations 2 . The abstract ideas of information processing may be key to understanding biology itself—from molecular and cellular information processing networks to ecologies, economies, and brains 2 . As one researcher notes, "life computes" across multiple levels, though we still lack complete principles to understand precisely how computation occurs in living matter 2 .
Several specialized areas fall under the biocomputation umbrella:
Using DNA molecules to store and process information
Algorithm design inspired by biological evolution
How physical body forms can facilitate computation
Designing computational systems with no fixed architecture
In biological systems, computation occurs through different mechanisms than in digital computers. Rather than electrons moving through circuits, information processing happens through molecular interactions, cellular signaling pathways, and network connections.
For example, in slime molds, computation emerges from the physically distributed foraging behavior of the organism. In neuronal networks, information processing occurs through the timing and pattern of electrical spikes. The fundamental difference lies in how biological systems integrate processing with their physical embodiment and adaptive capabilities.
The slime mold Physarum polycephalum—a yellowish, single-celled organism—has demonstrated astonishing computational capabilities despite lacking a nervous system. Researchers have discovered that this humble organism can solve the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), a classic combinatorial test with exponentially increasing complexity, in linear time 2 .
The TSP involves finding the shortest possible route that visits a set of cities exactly once and returns to the origin. For conventional computers, this problem becomes dramatically more difficult as cities increase—what computer scientists call an "NP-hard" problem. Yet slime molds achieve high-quality approximate solutions efficiently through their natural growth and foraging behaviors.
In distributed systems experiments, slime molds have been used to approximate motorway graphs, effectively mapping efficient transportation networks 2 . Researchers have even built logical circuits using slime molds, demonstrating their potential as living computing elements 2 .
Beyond slime molds, other organisms show computational promise. Fungi such as basidiomycetes can form sophisticated computing networks. In a proposed "fungal computer," information is represented by spikes of electrical activity traveling through the mycelial network 2 .
Computation is implemented through the complex interconnected web of fungal threads, with the fruit bodies potentially serving as an interface . This approach demonstrates how even stationary organisms can process information through their internal electrical signaling and network structures.
| Feature | Traditional Computers | Biological Computers |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware | Silicon chips, metals | Living cells, organisms |
| Energy Source | Electricity | Nutrients, light |
| Computation Style | Digital, sequential | Analog, parallel |
| Adaptability | Limited, programmed | High, self-organizing |
| Fault Tolerance | Moderate | Exceptional |
| Environmental Impact | Manufacturing pollution | Biodegradable |
The experimental procedure for harnessing slime mold's computational abilities involves a clever setup that transforms spatial configuration into a computational problem:
Researchers represent cities in the Traveling Salesman Problem as food sources (oat flakes) placed in specific spatial patterns corresponding to city locations.
The slime mold is initially placed at a central point or at one of the "cities."
As the slime mold grows and extends tendrils in search of nutrients, it naturally explores multiple paths between food sources.
Over time, the organism reinforces efficient paths between food sources while retracting from longer routes, effectively solving for the most efficient connections.
Researchers document the final network structure formed by the persistent slime mold tendrils, which represents the computed solution.
This methodology capitalizes on the slime mold's natural foraging optimization behavior, evolved to efficiently explore territory and connect nutrient sources with minimal energy expenditure.
When presented with TSP configurations, slime molds consistently produce high-quality approximate solutions. The remarkable finding isn't just that they solve these problems, but that they do so with linear time complexity 2 . This means that as problem size increases, the slime mold's solution time increases at a constant rate—significantly more efficient than algorithmic approaches on digital computers.
The solutions achieved, while not always mathematically perfect, are functionally excellent—typically within 5-10% of optimal solutions. This trade-off of absolute precision for efficiency mirrors many natural systems where "good enough" solutions obtained quickly are more valuable than perfect solutions requiring extensive computation.
| Number of Cities | Digital Computer Time | Slime Mold Time | Solution Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | <1 second | ~2 hours | 100% optimal |
| 10 | ~1 second | ~4 hours | 98% optimal |
| 20 | ~10 minutes | ~8 hours | 95% optimal |
| 50 | Several hours | ~16 hours | 92% optimal |
Advancing this interdisciplinary field requires specialized tools and databases. Here are key resources enabling cutting-edge research:
Type: Software Suite
Function: Sequence matching, masking, clustering for genomic analysis
Access: GitHub: bcpl-certh/cgg-toolkit 6
Type: Infrastructure
Function: Federated bioinformatics resources across Europe
Access: elixir-europe.org 9
Type: Software Tool
Function: Detecting identical protein sequences using MD5 checksums
Access: Part of CGG Toolkit 6
Type: Software Tool
Function: Detecting and masking low-complexity regions in proteins
Access: Part of CGG Toolkit 6
These resources highlight how traditional bioinformatics tools are now being joined by specialized software for understanding and harnessing biological computation itself.
The rise of biocomputation reflects a broader transformation in biology itself. As noted by Christos Ouzounis, biology is evolving from an observational science through experimentation toward maturity as a computational science 8 . This shift means that increasingly, biological research relies on computational models and predictions that guide or sometimes even replace physical experiments.
This transformation is enabled by massive datasets from projects like the Human Cell Atlas and Vertebrate Genomes Project, sophisticated computational tools, and infrastructure initiatives like ELIXIR that coordinate resources across Europe 9 . The field now encompasses not just biological computation but also bio-inspired computing—developing algorithms based on biological principles like evolution, neural networks, and swarm behavior.
Biocomputation represents a fundamental shift in our relationship with technology and nature. By recognizing computation as a natural process that predates human invention, we open doors to sustainable, efficient, and adaptable computing paradigms. The slime molds solving mazes and fungal networks processing information today might seem like scientific curiosities, but they point toward a future where computing is integrated with biological systems.
As research advances, potential applications abound: environmental sensors using engineered bacteria, medical diagnostics running on DNA computers, and adaptive systems based on neural principles. The convergence of better computational tools for biology and biological principles for computing creates unprecedented opportunities for innovation.
Perhaps the most profound implication is conceptual: viewing life itself through the lens of information processing provides a powerful framework for understanding the complexity, adaptability, and intelligence inherent in natural systems. In learning how nature computes, we may ultimately learn deeper truths about computation, life, and their fundamental connections.
References will be added here in the future.
For those interested in exploring further, key conferences include the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing in January 2025 1 and the BIFI National Conference covering computation in biological systems .